Meet us at the Startup area, and at our workshop on Wednesday 7 October, 4:30 pm. Grimaldi Forum, a ten-minute pitch.
Book the workshopOur Assises workshopBY ROLE · CIO & CTO
Your projects rarely slip because security was too demanding. They slip because it arrived last, from outside the team, in a language delivery does not speak. Mindlapse moves the decision to the start: the project owner declares the initiative in business words, Ernest drafts the analysis, your experts validate, and the project ships with its controls and its evidence attached.
One intake for every initiative · Business, IT and security on one record · Closure proven, not declared
SBD-00214
Order management replatforming
High Application Customers and partnerscloud migrationpersonal datain build
Current step · Action plan 2 / 4
Step incomplete
To continue: the derogation needs its compensating measures and an expiry.
The project keeps moving; what is not yet proven is named, owned and dated.
THE SITUATION
The architecture is chosen, the vendor signed, the data model frozen. Every finding is now a renegotiation, and the delay is yours to explain.
The same forms for both: too heavy for one, too light for the other, and delivery learns to route around both.
The questionnaire was written for auditors. The project owner guesses, the analyst re-does the work, and the answer helped no one.
End of life, business critical, and its risk lives in a slide from three years ago that nobody owns.
WHAT MINDLAPSE CHANGES
Surface: Security by Design
Every initiative declares itself once, in business words; criticality and exposure route it to the assisted fast track or to analyst review, and a person validates on both. Nothing runs in your pipeline and no code is scanned.
Learn more
Surface: Risk Analysis
The analysis, the baseline controls and the residual risk arrive proposed, each with a confidence level and its sources; accepting, correcting or rejecting is an explicit act, recorded with the person who made it.
Learn more
Surface: Action queue
The project owner, the architect, the DPO and the supplier contact work one record; assignments, approvals, deadlines and alerts reach the Slack and Microsoft Teams channels you configure. Jira and ServiceNow are in the catalog with activation to come, and no cloud, identity or EDR connector is live.
Learn more
Surface: Derogation lane
A requirement the project cannot meet becomes a derogation: a risk assessment at the gate, approval at the right level with the trail attached, compensating measures tracked as actions, scored coverage, and an expiry that reopens the decision.
Learn more
Surface: Control Atlas
An action closes on evidence: the changed control, the attached artefact, the re-scored risk, and the trail says who verified it. The evidence keeps its date and its source, so what has aged is visible before the auditor finds it.
Learn more
Surface: Value Chain Map
The chain models the activities the business runs and the systems that serve them, each with an owner and a criticality, so a project shows what it touches and what depends on it. Not a CMDB: no hostnames, no instances.
Learn more
YOUR WEEK, YOUR QUARTER
Security keeps pace with delivery when the decision happens at the start, the routine is assisted, and closure is granted on evidence.
Your week
MON 09:15
The replatforming declared itself at intake, in business words.
Criticality and exposure routed it to analyst review; two low-exposure changes took the assisted fast track the same morning.
Surface: Security by Design
TUE 11:30
The analysis of the new customer portal was due.
Ernest proposed it with its sources and a confidence level; your analyst accepted two recommendations, rejected one, and the trail kept both decisions.
Surface: Risk Analysis
alert: WED 14:00
The legacy billing interface could not meet the requirement.
It entered the derogation lane with compensating measures, an approver at the right level and an expiry that reopens the decision.
Surface: Derogation lane
THU 10:00
The architect, the DPO and the supplier were each waiting on the others.
The action plan named all three on one record, and the assignments and deadlines reached the team’s Microsoft Teams channel.
Surface: Action queue
verified: FRI 15:00
The go-live review met.
It read the same board as security: every action by stage, and closure granted on the evidence attached, not on a status.
Surface: Lifecycle board
Your quarter
WEEK 3
Obsolescence review.
Every derogation with its expiry, its coverage and its weight on posture, on one lane.
Surface: Derogation lane
WEEK 8
The outsourcer’s renewal.
Assessed in the context of the service it runs; its remediation a joint action plan that both sides accept, reject or counter-propose.
Surface: Supplier Hub
WEEK 12
IT steering.
Closure rates and SLA delivery by organization, read from the queue, not rebuilt for the meeting.
Surface: SLA scoreboard
Illustrative week: the moments are fictional, the surfaces are the product’s.
FROM THE FIELD
CYBER COLLECTIVE LAB · Edition 3
What delivery teams said: the edition on the Security by Design factory in automotive, field feedback from the people who ship the projects on what an intake and a fast track change for them.
Measured with our design-partner CISOs, figures under continuous validation.
UNDER THE HOOD
FAQ
A few minutes at intake. The project owner answers a wizard in business words: what the initiative does, its exposure, the data it touches. The security translation, classification, baseline controls and analysis happen on the platform side, and the routing follows from that declaration.
No. Nothing runs in your pipeline and no code is scanned. The shift-left is one of governance: the decision, the baseline controls and the exception are settled before and during build, and your engineering toolchain keeps doing what it does.
No. Ernest proposes, with a confidence level and the sources behind each suggestion, and a person accepts, corrects or rejects; the decision is written to the trail with the name of whoever made it. The models are open-source, hosted in Europe, and never trained on your data.
Everyone the project touches: project owners, architects, the DPO, internal audit, your suppliers’ contacts. Users are contractually unlimited and the subscription is set by the headcount band of the organization in scope, so nobody is left off the record to save a seat.
From the records that ran the project. An action closes on evidence, the changed control, the attached artefact, the re-scored risk, and the trail says who verified it. Ernest checks a claim against the evidence on file and returns a verdict with its sources, or says it cannot.
Read it next
One verified control set for the supplier, the buyer and the manufacturer you are at once.
Learn more
Care pathways as the map, télémaintenance under due diligence, unpatchable devices governed.
Learn more
Every téléservice with a decision file, every obligation on one evidence base, hosted only in Europe.
Learn more
Also by outcome
GLOSSARY
PROJECTS THAT SHIP
A live session on your delivery flow: intake in business words, routing, the draft your experts validate, closure on evidence.
Our host’s audience measurement (Vercel) uses no cookies and is not covered by this choice. Google Analytics and marketing trackers stay off until you say otherwise. Read the cookie policy